loader image
January 30, 2017 /
Man vs Volumetric

 

Jamie was entirely focused on the shots when he made them. This does not represent a true service situation and is a big leg-up for the Human party. No human can focus on 3 groups during service with any kind of accuracy.

We use VST 22g Precision Filters, Lab refractometers and Extractmojo software. The prism was cleaned with an alcohol wipe between every sample, and the device was calibrated with distilled water regularly. All pipettes and syringes were rinsed twice in the fluid to be measured before taking samples.

Espresso machine was never operating multiple groups during experiment.
Every pair of samples was alternated between Jamie or the Volumetric dose being ground first.
The espresso bar was in service across a period of 3 hours. The grinder was adjusted during this time to keep our drinks to spec, as we would every day.

As you can see in the spreadsheet, Jamie chose time as the variable to control. From the accuracy of his brewing ratios, even scales on the drip tray would not have helped him very much. We’re trying to emulate a service environment, hence why we didn’t use scales on the drip tray.

TDS is also an important measure of consistency. This is made redundant when the dose is a fixed variable, so we rely on ext% for our results.

Analysis:
Volumetric no. 7
The volumetrics chose to stop the shot at 35 seconds. The ext% and brewing ratio were still within parameters, and the shot tasted great.
(NB – Without this sample, the range for time would be 4 seconds, and standard deviation 1.21.)

Volumetric no. 1
This is the shot in which the volumetrics performed worst (in my opinion). The TDS was lowest, time 2nd highest and yield highest. Taking Jamie no. 1 into consideration, the grind looks to be finer at this time than the rest of the sample set, as Jamie managed to reach an 18.6% extraction with an on-time 54.4% brew.

Jamie no. 6
Jamie’s worst shot. He went by time, but the grinder foiled him with a spontaneously coarser grind size. In Volumetric no. 6 – the next shot – the volumetrics noticed an increased flow rate and cut the shot earlier, resulting in a correct extraction.

There is an error in all paddle-wheel based volumetric systems which actually works in the baristas favour. When there is lower pressure through the system, a paddle wheel measures all of the passing fluid. When there is higher pressure, the paddle wheel will not measure all of the passing fluid; some will “skip” the paddle wheel. This is because there are small gaps between the enclosure and the wheel (and other fluid dynamics stuff like compression) that allow some passing fluid past without registering.

eg. You’re making espressos with 21g dose and 41g yield in 27 seconds. You accidentally dose 0.5g less for one handle and engage the pump – there will be lower pressure at the paddlewheel due to less resistance in the basket. The volumetric will register more of the fluid, and stop the shot “earlier” than you would have, hence maintaining your brewing ratio. It works the other way round too.

I think it’s safe to say: if you’re not using volumetrics or weighing every single shot’s dose and yield, your espresso bar will be grossly inconsistent. There’s really no excuse, it’s 2014!

 

If you have enjoyed reading this and want to enjoy delicious coffee with the rest of the community – register for our monthly Superlatives coffee subscription. Or if you just want to keep up with every thing Barista Hustle – sign up to the Newsletter.

Coaching Calendar

Find a course with a BH Certified Coach

April 2020

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1
  • Untitled
  • INA: Barista One
2
  • INA: Percolation
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
  • FR: PERCOLATION
25
  • FR: BARISTA ONE
26
27
28
29
30

News & Updates

Sign-up, Take part and keep in touch!

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Gabriel Rhodes
Guest
Gabriel Rhodes

Looking back on this article with it being now 2017. Moving forward how do we think Volumetric’s compare to Manual? I’ve bene working on mostly Volumetric machines lately (Spirit, Strada 3 Group Volumetric) and notice a lot of inconsistencies within programming (2 – 4 grams more or less when programming with a fixed Volume). Should there be a specific variable that we stay fixed on when dealing with volumetric’s? (Time, Volume, Dose)

Matt Perger
Guest
Matt Perger

Volumetrics are still laughably better than manual. Always.

Aim for yield/shot weight/volume. 🙂

Copyright © 2019 Barista Hustle, All Rights Reserved!

You have Successfully Subscribed!